Considering total fees when evaluating OCIOs

Home
Solutions

Operations
Achieving operational excellence with business process outsourcing and data management that help clients achieve efficiency and performance.

Asset management
Connecting investors to what matters most, so they can achieve their goals and make confident decisions
Insights

for institutional investors

for wealth management firms, financial advisors and their clients

Corporate insights
Perspectives and happenings from our leaders and experts.

Newsroom
The latest news and announcements.
Discover SEI ^®

Our story
Who we are, what we do, and how we do it.

Our commitment
Building brave futures through the power of connection.

Our leadership

Newsroom

Careers

4 MIN READ

As we talk to investors evaluating OCIO, it has become clear that many are missing a big part of the picture when it comes to comparing fees. When the investment model was first introduced, OCIO advisory fees and underlying manager fees were bundled together. As time has moved on, the competitive market led to more fee transparency and the separation of those fees. This shift, however, has also caused investors to over-rely on the OCIO fee and not consider the manager fees themselves.

OCIO fees: Comparing manager fees

View transcript

Close transcript

As fiduciaries for your investment program, thank you for taking the initiative to conduct additional due diligence on the evaluation of OCIO providers. Today we will discuss the importance of fee transparency and the total cost of partnering with an OCIO.

Decades ago, when the delegated investment management model was first introduced, OCIO advisory fees and underlying manager fees were often bundled together. Over time, a competitive OCIO market and the need for fee transparency has led to a separation of those fees.

The shift to greater transparency was and is a very good thing. However, this had led some investors to over-rely on the standalone OCIO fee, oftentimes ignoring arguably the largest portion of total cost: investment manager fees.

Let’s compare sample fees for two discretionary investment providers.

In this example, we have an institutional investor with a $200 million portfolio, only investing in public markets, that already has determined the value of investment manager fee-savings within the OCIO model
OCIO firm A has a 20 basis point advisory fee and OCIO firm B is proposing a 25 basis point advisory fee
Next let’s take a look at the investment management fees across a diversified public market portfolio; we will allocate the assets the same for both OCIO firms in order to maintain consistency
The total weighted average investment manager fees for OCIO A are 48 basis points while OCIO B weighted investment manager fees are only 21 basis points
OCIO A has a total fee of 68 basis points, while OCIO B has a total fee of 46 basis points
So, while OCIO A has a lower advisory fee, the total fee is significantly higher than OCIO B. This should be important criteria when evaluating providers.
So, what makes the OCIO fee higher for one provider versus another? Our next blog and video will address the different type of services offered by OCIO firms to better explain the differences in advisory fees.

As a fiduciary for an institutional investment pool, your job can be challenging.
We believe that fee transparency and the importance of accurately comparing all fees are critical decisions to help you achieve your goals and objectives.

Information provided by SEI Investments Management Corporation (SIMC) and SEI Investments Canada Company, wholly owned subsidiaries of SEI Investments Company. SIMC is a registered investment adviser and SEI Investments Canada Company is the manager of the SEI Funds in Canada. Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that risk can be managed successfully, This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as research or investment advice and is intended for educational purposes only.

More on OCIO fees

If you are examining OCIO fees, make sure you are covering all of your basis. Check out important points from the first part of our OCIO fee series.

The OCIO fee is only part of your cost
Fee transparency is critical. The all-in fee is what matters most.
Comparing OCIO services
Quantitative and qualitative factors to consider in the total OCIO cost
Weighing quantitative and qualitative factors in OCIO fees
If the OCIO or advisory fee is only part of the cost, what could be included in the total cost?

Ready for the next step?

Build your custom RFP with targeted questions. Develop your own request for proposal with topics that matter most to your organization.

Build your own RFP

Michael Cagnina

Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Institutional Group

Information provided by SEI Investments Management Corporation (SIMC) and SEI Investments Canada Company, wholly owned subsidiaries of SEI Investments Company. SIMC is a registered investment adviser and SEI Investments Canada Company is the manager of the SEI Funds in Canada. Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that risk can be managed successfully. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. This information should not be relied upon as research or investment advice and is intended for educational purposes only.